Design and Validation of the Model of Dimensions and Factors Influencing the Construct of Electronic Leadership in Governmental Organizations

Authors

    Ehsan Cheshmishi Department of Management, Sa.C., lslamic Azad University, Sanandaj, lran.
    Fereydoun Ahmadi * Department of Management, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Lran freyedon@pnu.ac.ir
    Adel Salavati Department of Management, Sa.C., lslamic Azad University, Sanandaj, lran.

Keywords:

 Iran, government organizations, e-leadership, validation, Model design

Abstract

This study was conducted with the aim of designing and validating a model of dimensions and factors influencing the construct of electronic leadership in governmental organizations. In terms of purpose, the present research is applied; in terms of orientation, it is descriptive–exploratory; and in terms of research strategy, it is a mixed-methods (qualitative–quantitative sequential) design. In the qualitative phase, the phenomenological method was employed to examine and analyze the perspectives and experiences of experts in order to identify the dimensions and components shaping the electronic leadership model in governmental organizations and, based on that, to propose a conceptual model. In the quantitative phase, the developed model was tested and validated. The participants in the qualitative phase included academic experts and active managers in governmental organizations familiar with the subject of the study. For sampling, a non-probability purposive judgmental method was used, through which the researcher gained access to the opinions of 14 individuals. The statistical population in the quantitative phase consisted of executive experts (including unit managers and deputy general directors) and senior specialists at the central building of the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance. For sampling in this phase, a random sampling method was applied, and Morgan’s table was used to determine the sample size, which was set at 86 individuals. The data collection instrument in the qualitative phase was the semi-structured interview, while in the quantitative phase, a researcher-made questionnaire was used. For data analysis in the qualitative section, the phenomenological method with three-stage coding (open, axial, and selective) was employed. In the quantitative section, after collecting the data through the questionnaire, the obtained information was coded and analyzed using SPSS and SMART PLS software at a significance level of 5%. The findings of the research indicated that the proposed model comprises six dimensions (main categories) and 32 components (subcategories), including: The dimension of communicational and interactional requirements, The dimension of the leader’s psychological requirements, The dimension of attention to employee alignment and synchronization requirements, The dimension of process-related requirements, The dimension of technical and professional requirements, and The dimension of guidance and strategic requirements. Furthermore, the quantitative findings obtained from testing the research model through structural equation modeling revealed that all paths between the variables were confirmed and, given the significance values obtained (p < .05), were statistically significant. In addition, the model was validated based on goodness-of-fit indices. For this purpose, indices such as the Normed Fit Index (NFI), SRMR, and RMS Theta were applied, and the results indicated an acceptable model fit.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afjeh, S. A. A., Khashaei Varnamkhasti, V., Dehghanian, H., & Masouyeh Mobarakeh, A. (2023). A model of virtual leadership. Studies in Management Improvement and Transformation, 32(107), 7-44. https://jmsd.atu.ac.ir/article_14158.html

AlAjmi, M. K. (2022). The impact of digital leadership on teachers' technology integration during the COVID-19 pandemic in Kuwait. International Journal of Educational Research, 112, 101928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101928

Banks, G. C., Dionne, S. D., Mast, M. S., & Sayama, H. (2022). Leadership in the digital era: A review of who, what, when, where, and why. The Leadership Quarterly, 101634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2022.101634

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative & Mixed Method Approaches. Sage Publications. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/141545340.pdf

Creusen, U., Gall, B., & Hackl, O. (2017). Digital Leadership: Führung in Zeiten des digitalen Wandels. Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17812-3

Dijkstra, J. (2020). Digital Leadership and Firm Performance: a Meta-Analysis

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1982). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. ECTJ, 30(4), 233-252. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765185

Kamali Rad, I., & Jalali Rishahri, A. (2024). Investigating the impact of electronic leadership principles on public relations effectiveness and organizational improvement. Quarterly Journal of New Research Approaches in Management and Accounting, 8(92), 1772-1796. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://majournal.ir/index.php/ma/article/view/2484&ved=2ahUKEwjEmvSPgbCPAxWkwvACHVdTDVEQFnoECBsQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0HzZ7ID817AkLwRAdn0eHc

Mahdi, O. R., & Nassar, I. A. (2021). The Business Model of Sustainable Competitive Advantage through Strategic Leadership Capabilities and Knowledge Management Processes to Overcome COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability, 13(17), 9891. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179891

Maheshwari, G., Clarke, S., Nguyen, Q. A. N., McClelland, R., & Kunte, M. (2024). Effect of E-leadership on employees' outcomes in the higher education sector during COVID-19 and beyond: A case study from Vietnam. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 17411432231222715. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432231222715

Mahmoudi Fard, A., & Maleki, A. (2023). Investigating the impact of governance and electronic leadership on public management. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://civilica.com/doc/1804692/&ved=2ahUKEwjOmIqfgbCPAxWSrokEHZD8IdgQFnoECBwQAQ&usg=AOvVaw14YN65jCeIDydZg2tNbniY

Malazahi, M., Salajeghe, S., Hasani Ahmadiyeh, S., Firoozabadi, A., & Jalali Jowaran, R. (2021). Strategic Management Research. 27(81), 175-147.

Mihardjo, L., Sasmoko, S., Alamsjah, F., & Elidjen, E. (2019). Digital leadership role in developing business model innovation and customer experience orientation in industry 4.0. Management Science Letters, 9(11), 1749-1762. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.6.015

Osterrider, P., Budde, L., & Friedli, T. (2020). The smart factory as a key construct of industry 4.0: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Production Economics, 10(221), 91-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.08.011

Rastgar, A. A., Manafi Varkiani, M., Raoufi, M., & Hemmati, A. (2023). Clarifying the role of electronic leadership in electronic governance (with a focus on the seventh development plan of the country). https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://civilica.com/doc/1861295/&ved=2ahUKEwiBqbPEgbCPAxXKjYkEHa2hNZUQFnoECAoQAQ&usg=AOvVaw1No2vsaD1l5wX9DSMVHE66

Sasmoko, S., Mihardjo, L., Alamsjah, F., & Elidjen, E. (2019). Dynamic capability: The effect of digital leadership on fostering innovation capability based on market orientation. Management Science Letters, 9(10), 1633-1644. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.5.024

Schiuma, G., Schettini, E., & Santarsiero, F. (2021). How wise companies drive digital transformation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(2), 122. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7020122

Stjepić, A. M., Ivančić, L., & Vugec, D. S. (2020). Mastering digital transformation through business process management: Investigating alignments, goals, orchestration, and roles. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 16(1), 41-74. https://doi.org/10.7341/20201612

Wesly, J., Kristiana, V., Bong, T., & Saputra, N. (2021). Pengaruh Digital Leadership, Total Quality Management, dan Knowledge Management terhadap Sustainability Management pada Perusahaan di DKI Jakarta. Studi Ilmu Manajemen Dan Organisasi, 2(2), 97-124. https://doi.org/10.35912/simo.v2i2.543

Zarei Benadkouki, A. (2022). Investigating the role of digital leadership on the performance of Yazd Municipality. Applied Studies in Management and Development Sciences, 7(2). https://www.noormags.ir/view/en/articlepage/2058937/

Downloads

Published

2025-09-11

Submitted

2025-04-07

Revised

2025-08-01

Accepted

2025-08-09

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Cheshmishi, E. ., Ahmadi, F., & Salavati, A. (1404). Design and Validation of the Model of Dimensions and Factors Influencing the Construct of Electronic Leadership in Governmental Organizations. Training, Education, and Sustainable Development, 3(2), 1-18. https://journaltesd.com/index.php/tesd/article/view/106

Similar Articles

1-10 of 147

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.