Developing a Conceptual Model of School Strategies for Fostering Student Responsibility

Authors

    Mehdi Ghaffari * Department of Curriculum Planning, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran Ghaffarimehdi12@yahoo.com

Keywords:

Moral education, responsibility, school strategies, thematic analysis, value education, collaborative learning

Abstract

The objective of this study was to develop a conceptual model of school strategies for fostering student responsibility based on the experiences of educational experts. This qualitative study employed thematic analysis. The participants included 20 teachers, school principals, counselors, and education specialists in Tehran, selected through purposive and snowball sampling. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews and analyzed using Nvivo software until theoretical saturation was achieved. Data credibility was ensured through participant review and peer debriefing. The thematic analysis led to the identification of three major categories: "educational structures of the school," "human and cultural interactions of the school," and "educational and learning strategies." Each category comprised various subcategories such as developing a moral vision, formative assessment, effective teacher–student communication, behavioral role modeling by staff, life skills education, project-based learning, and integrating responsibility in the curriculum. Together, these categories formed a coherent conceptual model for promoting student responsibility. The findings indicate that fostering student responsibility requires multilayered strategies at structural, cultural, and instructional levels within the school. Implementing a structured model can support educational policymakers and practitioners in designing and delivering effective moral and responsibility-based programs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Berkowitz, M. W., & Bier, M. C. (2005). What works in character education: A research-driven guide for educators. Character Education Partnership.

Brady, L. (2006). Supporting responsible student behavior. Pearson Education Australia.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Eccles, J. S., & Gootman, J. A. (2002). Community programs to promote youth development. National Academy Press.

Keller, K., & Karau, S. J. (2013). The importance of responsibility and accountability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(4), 681–693.

Lickona, T. (1991). Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. Bantam Books.

Narvaez, D., Bock, T., Endicott, L., & Lies, J. (2004). Beyond the three Rs: A call for character education. Educational Leadership, 61(6), 24–29.

Watson, M. (2003). Learning to trust: Transforming difficult elementary classrooms through developmental discipline. Jossey-Bass.

Youniss, J., & Yates, M. (1997). Community service and social responsibility in youth. University of Chicago Press.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-03

Submitted

2024-01-19

Revised

2024-02-27

Accepted

2024-03-17

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Ghaffari, M. (1403). Developing a Conceptual Model of School Strategies for Fostering Student Responsibility. Training, Education, and Sustainable Development, 2(1), 1-9. https://journaltesd.com/index.php/tesd/article/view/41

Similar Articles

1-10 of 53

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.