Identifying the Indicators for Integrating Climate Education into Official School Curricula
Keywords:
Sustainable lifestyle, moral education, primary education, thematic analysis, environmental educationAbstract
The purpose of this study was to identify the educational dimensions of sustainable lifestyle in the content of primary education, focusing on expert perspectives in curriculum planning, environmental education, and moral training. This qualitative study employed thematic analysis. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 25 experts in primary education, curriculum design, environmental education, and ethics. Participants were selected purposefully based on relevant expertise and experience. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using NVivo software until theoretical saturation was achieved. Three main themes emerged: “Ethical and Responsible Living,” “Sustainable Coexistence with Nature,” and “Informed and Future-Oriented Decision-Making.” These included nine subthemes and various concepts such as social responsibility, environmental sensitivity, low-consumption lifestyle, self-regulation, justice orientation, critical thinking, and behavioral consequence awareness. Together, they reflect the multidimensional nature of sustainable lifestyle education in the primary curriculum. The findings suggest that education for a sustainable lifestyle requires an integrative approach that simultaneously addresses ethical, environmental, and cognitive dimensions. Revising primary education curricula and empowering teachers to effectively instill sustainability values are critical steps recommended by the study.
Downloads
References
Anderson, A. (2012). Climate change education for mitigation and adaptation. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 6(2), 191–206.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Hestness, E., McGinnis, J. R., Riedinger, K., & Marbach-Ad, G. (2014). Preservice science teachers’ conceptualizations of climate change literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 36(7), 1190–1217.
IPCC. (2021). Sixth Assessment Report (AR6). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Kazemi, M., Esmaeili, S., & Mozaffari, M. (2020). Investigating environmental concepts in Iranian science textbooks. Environmental Education Research, 26(4), 527–541.
Monroe, M. C., Plate, R. R., Oxarart, A., Bowers, A., & Chaves, W. A. (2019). Identifying effective climate change education strategies: A systematic review of the research. Environmental Education Research, 25(6), 791–812.
Shephard, K., Mann, S., Smith, N., & Deaker, L. (2015). How best to ensure that the capability to think and act sustainably becomes a disposition of graduates. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 39(3), 408–421.
Stevenson, R. B., Nicholls, J., & Whitehouse, H. (2017). What is climate change education? Curriculum Perspectives, 37(1), 67–71.
Taghvaei, M., & Amiri, M. (2021). Challenges and strategies of climate change education in Iran: A policy analysis. Iranian Journal of Environmental Education, 3(2), 115–132
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.