Identifying the Dimensions of Social Meaning-Making in Development-Oriented Education

Authors

    Fatemeh Sharifian Department of Educational Management, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
    Hamidreza Sadeghi * Department of Educational Management, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran sadeghi.hmdrz@gmail.com

Keywords:

Social meaning-making, development-oriented education, meaningful learning, educational identity, social interaction, thematic analysis

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the dimensions of social meaning-making in the process of development-oriented education. Using a qualitative design, the study employed semi-structured interviews with 21 teachers, education experts, and policy professionals in Tehran. Participants were selected purposefully, and data collection continued until theoretical saturation. Data were analyzed thematically using NVivo software to extract core patterns and dimensions of social meaning-making within the context of development-oriented education. Analysis revealed three main categories: “Purposeful Social Interaction,” “Representation of Identity and Meaning in Education,” and “Facilitating Meaningful Action in Learning.” Each category encompassed multiple subthemes and open codes, illustrating that social meaning-making is a multidimensional construct shaped by interpersonal, cultural, and contextual factors. The findings suggest that development-oriented education can lead to meaningful learning when it fosters interactive relationships, supports identity reflection, and enables learners to engage in socially meaningful actions. These results provide valuable insights for curriculum designers, teacher training programs, and education policy reform.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Biesta, G. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Routledge.

Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Harvard University Press.

Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.

Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn?. Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.

Hook, D. (2016). Critical psychology. Routledge.

Illeris, K. (2009). Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theorists in their own words. Routledge.

Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass.

Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 1997(74), 5–12.

UNESCO. (2015). Rethinking education: Towards a global common good? Paris: UNESCO.

Van Manen, M. (2002). Writing in the dark: Phenomenological studies in interpretive inquiry. The Althouse Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wright, L. (2020). Social learning environments and their role in meaning-making in secondary education. Journal of Educational Change, 21(2), 165–183.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-03

Submitted

2024-01-23

Revised

2024-02-29

Accepted

2024-03-20

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Sharifian, F., & Sadeghi, H. (1403). Identifying the Dimensions of Social Meaning-Making in Development-Oriented Education. Training, Education, and Sustainable Development, 2(1), 1-9. https://journaltesd.com/index.php/tesd/article/view/40

Similar Articles

1-10 of 53

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.