Identifying the Educational Dimensions of Sustainable Lifestyle in Primary Education Content
Keywords:
Sustainable lifestyle, moral education, primary education, thematic analysis, environmental educationAbstract
The purpose of this study was to identify the educational dimensions of sustainable lifestyle in the content of primary education, focusing on expert perspectives in curriculum planning, environmental education, and moral training. This qualitative study employed thematic analysis. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 25 experts in primary education, curriculum design, environmental education, and ethics. Participants were selected purposefully based on relevant expertise and experience. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using NVivo software until theoretical saturation was achieved. Three main themes emerged: “Ethical and Responsible Living,” “Sustainable Coexistence with Nature,” and “Informed and Future-Oriented Decision-Making.” These included nine subthemes and various concepts such as social responsibility, environmental sensitivity, low-consumption lifestyle, self-regulation, justice orientation, critical thinking, and behavioral consequence awareness. Together, they reflect the multidimensional nature of sustainable lifestyle education in the primary curriculum. The findings suggest that education for a sustainable lifestyle requires an integrative approach that simultaneously addresses ethical, environmental, and cognitive dimensions. Revising primary education curricula and empowering teachers to effectively instill sustainability values are critical steps recommended by the study.
Downloads
References
Afsar, B., Badir, Y., & Kiani, U. S. (2020). Linking spiritual leadership and employee pro-environmental behavior: The role of workplace spirituality, intrinsic motivation, and environmental passion. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 67, 101370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101370
Barr, S. (2003). Strategies for sustainability: citizens and responsible environmental behaviour. Area, 35(3), 227-240.
Boeve-de Pauw, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2010). A cross-national perspective on youth environmental attitudes. Environmental Education Research, 16(1), 1–16.
Gough, S. (2002). Increasing the value of the environment: a ‘real options’ metaphor for learning. Environmental Education Research, 8(1), 61–72.
Kagawa, F. (2007). Dissonance in students’ perceptions of sustainable development and sustainability: Implications for curriculum change. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 8(3), 317–338.
Olsson, D., Gericke, N., & Chang Rundgren, S. N. (2016). The effect of implementation of education for sustainable development in Swedish compulsory schools–assessing pupils’ sustainability consciousness. Environmental Education Research, 22(2), 176-202.
Schreiner, C., Henriksen, E. K., & Hansen, P. J. K. (2005). Climate education: Empowering today's youth to meet tomorrow's challenges. Studies in Science Education, 41(1), 3–49.
Sipos, Y., Battisti, B., & Grimm, K. (2008). Achieving transformative sustainability learning: engaging head, hands and heart. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9(1), 68–86.
Sterling, S. (2010). Transformative learning and sustainability: sketching the conceptual ground. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, (5), 17-33.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
